Resonance Chart of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs)

 

Mod0EnergyRad

Fig. 1. SWNTs (L1,L2) with Mod(L1-L2,3)=0 (metallic).

The optical transition energies of all SWNTs in the radius range from 0.3 nm to 1.2 nm were calculated using the symmetry-adapted non-orthogonal tight-binding model [1,2]. Self-energy and excitonic corrections are not included.

 

The results are given in Figs. 1 and 2 for Mod0 tubes (metallic tubes) and Mod1 and Mod2 tubes (semiconducting tubes), respectively. A zoomed-in part of both figures is shown in Fig. 3. These resonance charts are also known as Kataura plots.

 

The comparison of the calculated optical transitions with photoluminescence data showed that these corrections amount to an upshift of about 0.3 eV for the first and second transitions in semiconducting tubes[2].

 

The optical transition energies, derived within the non-orthogonal-tight-binding model, were published in Ref. [3] (see, EPAPS)

 

The comparison to recent Raman data showed that these corrections are larger for the higher optical transitions of semiconducting and metallic tubes and an average upshift of about 0.45 eV was obtained[4]. This larger upshift is in favor of the much smaller excitonic effects for optical transitions higher than E11 and E22 of semiconducting tubes.

 

More experimental work is in progress to give more precise estimate of the deviation of the non-orthogonal tight-binding results from the experimental values thus throwing more light on the self-energy and excitonic effects in nanotubes.

 

References

1. V. N. Popov, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 17/1-17.

2. V. N. Popov and L. Henrard, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 115407.

3. V. N. Popov, Luc Henrard, and Ph. Lambin, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 035436.

4. M. Paillet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 257401

 

Mod12EnergyRad

Fig. 2. SWNTs (L1,L2) with Mod(L1-L2,3)=1 or 2 (semiconducting).

Fig. 3. Same as for Figs. 1 and 2 but for energies between 1.2 and 2.4 eV, and radii between 3 and 7 Å.

 

 

Back

Valentin Popov

October 5, 2006